Your compliance program — run by practitioners, proven to your bank.
Compliance Command Center pairs an AI-native compliance engine with embedded compliance practitioners. From self-serve software to a fully embedded compliance officer, you choose how much we run — and we produce the examiner-ready evidence your sponsor bank and your next examiner will accept.
Compliance programs break two predictable ways. Build it in-house and the logic stays trapped in people instead of systems — when those people leave, the program decays. Buy a vendor tool and you operate it yourself, still short a compliance officer. CCC is the synthesis: software you run, and a credentialed practitioner who runs it with you. The officer that stays when your people leave.
You choose how much we run
Self-serve software, co-run with a CSM, or a fully embedded compliance officer. The engine is the same at every tier — what changes is how much of your program we run with you. Not consultants who leave you a stale deck — practitioners who embed, backed by software that keeps you examiner-ready continuously.
For fintechs and small teams that have the people to operate a tool but want enforcement-calibrated scoring, dollar-priced gaps, and regulatory monitoring they don't have to build.
You run the engine. Score your program's design against the enforcement-calibrated control library, get gaps priced in dollars, and stay current on regulatory change. Value in ~30 days, no procurement.
Early access
For teams that want the engine but need a practitioner to co-run it — interpret findings, drive remediation, and prep for a sponsor-bank review without a full in-house BSA/AML function.
We co-run it with you. A compliance CSM operates the platform alongside your team: produces the risk assessment and intel report, sequences remediation, maintains examiner-readiness state, and delivers a monthly practitioner-curated digest.
Available now
For BaaS fintechs under sponsor-bank oversight that must prove a defensible program to the bank and a future examiner but lack a full in-house BSA/AML department.
CCC becomes your compliance function. A credentialed practitioner (JD/CAMS, multi-bank BaaS experience) embeds with your team, runs your FFIEC Pillar-3 independent testing, builds your issue-management and governance structure, and represents the program to your sponsor bank and examiner — backed by the engine and the five-agent continuous loadout.
Available now · practitioner-led
A compliance program that
stays examiner-ready, continuously
The same engine your practitioner runs turns regulatory complexity into a defensible program — scored against real enforcement, with gaps priced in dollars, not opinions.
Your program's design is scored against a control library calibrated from real enforcement actions — so the gaps that surface are the ones regulators actually penalize. You see exactly where you stand, and what it would cost if you don't fix it.
CCC scores your policies and procedures against regulatory benchmarks, surfaces gaps with specific remediation guidance, and prices your exposure in dollars — so remediation is a business case, not an opinion.
Continuous monitoring across FinCEN, OFAC, CFPB, OCC, FINRA, and 200+ global sources. Know about regulatory changes before your next exam.
Every output carries audit trails, reasoning chains, and regulatory citations — a standing evidence chain an examiner can independently verify. Built for the people who have to defend the work across the table.
One engine. Any regulated industry.
CCC is a compliance program you can run yourself or have us run for you. The engine is industry-agnostic — the domain packs make it specific. We're launching with BSA/AML for financial services, with GDPR, HIPAA, and SOC 2 on the roadmap.
Starting with the teams that need it most: compliance teams at fintechs, neobanks, BaaS-powered companies, community banks, and credit unions — organizations underserved by legacy platforms built for enterprises with 50-person departments.
For fintechs — and the
banks that sponsor them
In the post-Synapse, post-Blue-Ridge, OCC third-party-risk environment, the bank can't delegate BSA/AML and the fintech has to prove its program is defensible. We sit on both sides of that relationship — built by a practitioner with enterprise compliance experience across multi-bank BaaS partnerships.
Post-Synapse, you have to prove your program is defensible to your sponsor bank and a future examiner — often without a full in-house BSA/AML department. We make it defensible and produce the independent-testing evidence your bank demands.
You can't delegate BSA/AML, but you must oversee every fintech partner's program. We give you defensible, continuously-maintained oversight evidence on every partner.
Five agents that keep
your program current
The embedded model isn't a slide deck — it's a continuous loadout running behind your practitioner. Five agents do the standing work between exams, every month, on your program.
Scores your program's design against the enforcement-calibrated control library — where you're defensible, where you're exposed.
Prices every gap in dollars — a Monte Carlo estimate of exposure, so remediation is a business case, not an opinion.
Rescans the regulatory landscape monthly across FinCEN, OFAC, CFPB, OCC, FINRA, and 200+ sources — so change reaches you before your next exam does.
Keeps your remediation roadmap current — sequenced, owned, and re-prioritized as your risk and the rules move.
Maintains the standing evidence chain — the audit trail an examiner can independently verify, kept current continuously, not assembled the week before an exam.
Independent BSA/AML testing
your bank can rely on
Independent BSA/AML testing that satisfies FFIEC Pillar 3 — control walkthroughs, sample testing, a findings register, and an audit-committee opinion, examiner-ready and CCC-signed as the auditing entity. The same engine that scores your program produces the workpapers and the attestation. For a Webster-sponsored fintech, this is the artifact your sponsor bank demands you produce.
When the software isn't enough, a vetted bench of JD/CAMS practitioners runs your independent testing, builds your issue-management structure, and sits across the table from your sponsor bank and your examiner — cashing out the practitioner claim as real audit authority. A standing evidence chain an examiner can independently verify.
Honest scope: today these independent-testing engagements are practitioner-led — software-leveraged, with a human in the loop on every deliverable. We're not claiming a fully automated, self-signing attestation. That's the differentiator, not a hedge.
Common questions
Not consultants who leave you a stale deck — practitioners who embed, backed by software that keeps you examiner-ready continuously.
