Comparison
Compared with the GRC platforms. Where they are strong, and where we are different.
You're probably looking at LogicGate, Optro (formerly AuditBoard), Hyperproof or Themis as well as us. Here's the comparison line by line, with the public source for every statement we make about them.
The short version
Workflow tools on their side, the whole compliance stack on ours
These four are workflow platforms: software your own team configures and runs to manage risk and compliance processes. They're strong at that, and the table shows where.
We're built for a different question: what your regulators are acting on now, and what a gap would cost you. Your risk is grounded in how regulators have actually enforced against firms like yours. Each gap gets a dollar range built from real penalties. You get a live read of regulator activity. Transaction monitoring, KYC and sanctions screening sit in the same product. And a compliance practitioner sets it up on your data and signs the work.
Capability by capability
What each one offers.
Based on each vendor's public materials as of September 2026. "Not listed" means we didn't find it in the public materials we reviewed; the vendor may still offer it.
| Capability | Rupture Labs | LogicGate | Optro | Hyperproof | Themis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk appetite | Yes | Yes | Yes | Partial: tolerance per risk | Not listed |
| Key risk indicators | Partial: from figures you enter | Yes, with threshold notifications | Yes | Not listed | Yes: KRI module |
| Risk in dollars | Yes: a range built from penalties in public enforcement actions | Yes: Open FAIR quantification, an add-on | Partial: Monte Carlo modeling | Not listed | Not listed |
| Live read of regulator activity | Yes | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Regulatory change management | Yes: collected daily from the issuing sources, reviewed by a person | Yes | Yes: RegComply | Not listed | Not listed (its change management module covers internal program changes) |
| Policy management | Yes: versioned, approved, drift flagged | Yes | Not listed on a current product page | Yes | Yes: policies and procedures modules |
| Issue management | Yes: owners, deadlines, closed against evidence | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes: issue management module |
| Marketing review | Yes: 25 Reg Z, Reg DD, FTC and FDIC checks | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed | Yes: marketing module |
| Third-party risk | Yes: on the 2023 interagency guidance, with SOC 2 review | Yes | Yes | Yes: vendor register | Yes: vendors module |
| Control testing | Yes: every record in the period | Yes | Yes, with sampling | Yes: manual and automated tests | Yes: monitoring and testing module |
| Board and examiner reporting | Yes: board pack and examiner pack | Yes | Yes | Partial | Not listed |
| Evidence connectors | Partial: exports and a local folder | Yes | Yes | Yes: Hypersync integrations | Not listed |
| Configure your own workflows | No: we set up every account | Yes: configurable applications | Partial | Partial: custom fields and scopes | Not listed |
| Transaction monitoring | Yes | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Sanctions screening and KYC | Yes | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
Where they are strong
What they do well
- Configurable workflows. LogicGate is built around applications you configure, and Hyperproof lets you define your own fields and scopes, so your team can shape the tool to its own process.
- Heat maps across the register. LogicGate, Optro and Hyperproof show risk registers as heat maps.
- Internal audit in the same tool. LogicGate and Optro plan and run internal audits alongside risk and compliance.
- Training and complaints modules. Themis runs training, complaints (including FINRA complaints) and marketing review as modules in a wider GRC workflow.
- Connectors and sign-in. Hyperproof, LogicGate and Optro connect to cloud, identity and ticketing systems and support single sign-on and SCIM.
Where we are different
A risk picture built from what regulators actually do
- Risk grounded in enforcement. Your risk picture starts from how regulators have acted against firms like yours, not only from your own ratings on a one-to-five scale.
- Dollar exposure from real penalties. Each gap gets an expected-cost range built from penalties in public enforcement actions, and we say so plainly when the data is too thin to give one.
- Regulatory weather. A live read of what regulators are doing now, taken from their own publications and actions.
- Answers that cite their source or refuse. Every answer is tied to the rule it rests on, or it tells you it can't answer.
- Financial crime in the same product. Transaction monitoring, KYC and sanctions screening sit next to your compliance program, so an alert, a screening decision and a control gap live on one record.
- Controls tested on every record. Each control is tested against every record in the period, not a sample.
- Delivered by forward deployed compliance officers. A practitioner sets the platform up on your data, reviews what it produces and signs it.
Which fits you
Choose them if, choose us if
Choose one of them if:
- You want a workflow tool your own team configures and runs, without a practitioner.
- You run a large internal audit function and want it inside a general-purpose GRC tool.
- Your main need is connecting many software systems to collect evidence automatically.
Choose us if:
- You're a sponsor bank, fintech, BaaS provider or money services business whose examiners look hardest at financial crime.
- You want your risk tied to real enforcement and priced in dollars, not only rated on a heat map.
- You want transaction monitoring, KYC and sanctions screening in the same product as your compliance program.
- You want answers tied to the rule they rest on.
- You want a practitioner who does the work and signs it, not only software your team has to run.
Sources
Where each statement about them comes from
Based on each vendor's public materials as of September 2026. Every page below was checked on 26 September 2026. If a vendor's materials have changed, or we've read one wrong, tell us and we'll correct this page.
LogicGate
- Risk register, heat maps, risk appetite, board reporting: enterprise risk management application
- Self-assessments, regulatory change, issue management: financial services
- Loss events: operational risk management
- Quantification and scenarios: Risk Cloud Quantify; sold as an add-on: packaging
- Key risk indicator thresholds: operational risk announcement
- Regulatory change content: CUBE partnership
- Policy management and attestations: policy management
- Configurable applications: applications
- Third-party risk: third-party risk management
- Control testing: controls compliance
- Internal audit: internal audit
- Evidence connectors: automated evidence collection
- SCIM and single sign-on: SCIM integration guide
Optro (formerly AuditBoard)
- The name change: announcement, March 2026
- Modules and connectors: product overview
- Risk register, self-assessments, risk appetite, scenarios, Monte Carlo modeling: risk management
- Loss reporting: AuditBoard blog
- Key risk indicators: RiskOversight announcement
- Regulatory change: RegComply
- Issues and reporting: compliance management
- Third-party risk: third-party risk management
- Control testing and sampling: SOX management
- Internal audit and auditor access: OpsAudit
- Single sign-on and SCIM: Microsoft Entra integration guide
Hyperproof
- Risk register, heat maps, tolerance per risk, reporting: risk management
- Policy management: policy management; acknowledgements as evidence: policy proof
- Issue management: issues management
- Vendor register: vendor register overview
- Control testing: automated control testing
- Audit request lists and auditor access: audit management
- Integrations: hyperproof.io
- Custom fields and scopes: roles and permissions
- Single sign-on: requiring SSO; SCIM: SCIM provisioning
Themis
- Module list (policies, procedures, marketing, issue management, change management, vendors, risk assessment, risk register, control inventory, complaints, monitoring and testing, training, FINRA complaints, audits, key risk indicators): themis.com
- Key risk indicators: KRI module
- Change management covers internal program and product changes: change management module
What we say about Rupture Labs matches our platform pages, including the list of what the platform doesn't do today.
Talk to a practitioner
Book a 15-minute chat with our founder.
A real conversation with a senior compliance leader, to see if there's a fit. Not a sales call, not a demo, no pressure.