Who we serve
AI governance. The whole stack, in one system.
The EU AI Act, and model risk management for the AI and models you build or buy. The same model as our financial services work: an experienced compliance officer who stands behind the judgment, with an engine that tests every record and prices every gap.
The problems we solve
What ai governance asks of you
- The EU AI Act sorts AI systems by risk and attaches different duties to each class.
- Model risk teams need documentation, validation and monitoring for models they did not build.
- Customers and partners now ask how your AI is governed before they sign.
The platform's rulebooks already include the EU AI Act and US AI governance guidance.
Plain English
How this is normally done
Reference articles from our library, cited to the published rules and standards.
- EU AI ActEU AI Act ComplianceWho the Act binds, the four risk tiers and Annex III high-risk systems, the obligations on providers and deployers, GPAI model duties, conformity assessment, and the phased timeline.
- Field GuideAI Model Governance for Compliance: An SR 26-2 Field GuideWhat SR 26-2, the April 2026 interagency model risk guidance that superseded SR 11-7, requires, which AI compliance tools it covers, what validation means, explainability and the audit trail, the human in the loop, and the questions to ask any AI vendor.
- EU AI ActEU AI Act Risk Management for High-Risk AIWhat Article 9 requires in a risk management system for high-risk AI, how it runs across the lifecycle, and where the FRIA (Article 27) fits.
Talk to a practitioner
Book a 15-minute chat with our founder.
A real conversation with a senior compliance leader, to see if there's a fit. Not a sales call, not a demo, no pressure.